|
Schedule
|
Traditional Court
|
WWWCPJ
|
|
1. Assemble All Relevant Evidence
|
Same
|
Same
|
|
2. Plaintiff / Prosecutor Completes
Documentation
|
Arrest warrant for criminal case / Summons and Complaint for civil case
|
Summons and Complaint prepared for criminal and/or civil offences challenging the individuals and/or entities in governance
|
|
3. File the Complaint
|
File with the Clerk of the Court
|
File by forwarding Summons and Complaint to the WWWCPJ and the
posting of all information and evidence on the Plaintiff's factual
basis web site.
|
|
4. Issue / Serve Summons and
Complaint
|
Personal service upon defendant with copy returned to the court
|
Serve public notice by positng the Summons and Compalint as
follows: 1) Post on the WWWCPJ web site in the Case Docket. 2) Post on
Plaintiff's factual basis web site. 3) Forward copies to three chosen
Media Referees. With this three step process, the Summons and Complaint
are now publically lodged and available for notice and inspection on
the Internet.
|
|
5. Defendant Answers Complaint
|
Defendant must file an answer with the Court Clerk within 20 days of
the receipt of notice and a copy is forwarded to the Plaintiff. The
answer is posted in the case file.
|
Defendant must file an answer to the WWWCPJ within 20 days of the
receipt of notice and a copy is forwarded to Plaintiff via electronic
mail attachment. A copy is posted on the Case Docket web page.
|
|
6. Pre-trial Activity
|
Depositions and Interrogatories, case preparation, pre-trial hearings etc. etc etc....
|
Media Investigator(s) called upon to interview Plaintiff, Defendant
and all witnesses, examine and confirm all evidence presented and to
explore all possibilities within the case for credibility and news
worthiness. All news worthy information obtained is reported to the
Judge (Media Referee) who then prepares the information for news
release to the Jury, We the People.
|
|
7. Trial Scheduling Process
|
Trial is set to begin before a Judge with choice of Judge or Jury
Trial (6 to 12 people). This process typically could take months or
longer.
|
Media Investigator(s) provide(s) constant information and news
updates and conclusions to the Judge (The Media Referee.) and the Judge
begins his regular news reports to the Jury (We the People).
|
|
8. Trial Begins
|
Evidence is presented under rules of procedure that are very strict
and formal with a judge presiding and attorneys operating under strict
guidleines that only they can understand.
|
The Jury’s (we the people's) reaction is carefully weighed and
re-reported to the Judge / Media Referee during the on-going
investigation and reporting of the results. The rules of order are
governed within the boundries of the good ethics and behavior of the
credible media source(s) involved.
|
|
9. New Evidence
|
Typically, new evidence is not permitted unless under extenuating circumstances.
|
New evidence is encouraged and always permitted and made available to
the jury through the on-going media investigation throughout the trial.
|
|
10. Trial Conclusion with Verdict.
|
In favor of the Plaintiff or Defendant, concluded.
|
Final verdict and result can be favorable or unfavorable to both
opposing parties depending upon the information revealed in the on-going
investigation.
|
|
11. Damages, Penalties, and
Sentencing
|
Final damages and/or sentencing are determined by the Jury as governed by the Judge.
|
Damages and sentencing vary depending upon the consequences of public
opinion. The Judge / Media Referee reports the people’s sentence by
poll or general consensus and such continues until the story is no
longer news worthy.
|
|
12. Execution and Severity of
Penalties / Sentence(s)
|
The losing party can be fined, incarcerated or in the case of capital crimes, executed.
|
Winners and losers are defined by the results of the on-going
investigation. The severity of any punishment can range from public
disapproval to business and / or career failure, traditional civil laws
suits filed and in the case of criminal misconduct, facing criminal
charges and entry into the traditional Criminal Justice System.
|
|
13. The Financial Cost of Justice
|
Ranges from the thousands, to the tens of thousands and can reach into the millions of dollars.
|
The cost is confined to the assembling, courier / posting of the
information and evidence, web site design and hosting fees if
applicable. Typically, appropriate web software can be purchased in the
hundreds of dollars. A web designer can be called in if affordable.
|
|
14. The Financial Availability of
Justice, Civil Case
|
Only available if you can afford it. If you cannot in a civil case
and must represent yourself, you will more than likely be disqualified
and your case dismissed.
|
The cost is affordable within the range of difficulty of the case and
the amount and kind of evidence gathered and posted. The cost can
typically be spread among a group who agree with your case. You may
reasonably represent yourself or the group without limitation.
|
|
15. The Financial Availability of
Justice, Criminal Case
|
If you cannot afford legal counsel, a public defender is assigned.
Unfortunately, the very state that is prosecuting you is also paying for
your defense attorney. All attorneys, by the way are officers of the
court, and their first allegiance is with the court. Conflict?
|
The cost is affordable and you may represent yourself with little or
no limitations. If your behavior as plaintiff or defendant is finally
determined as criminal in the on-going investigation, then you may find
yourself arrested and prosecuted in the formal criminal justice system.
|
|
16. Accountability of Existing
Political / Justice System
|
To be accountable to itself has been the inherent problem with every
political / justice system since the beginning of modern civilization.
|
As an objective third party, the Media in concert with the general
public has always provided the most effective checks and balances for
itself and the modern political / justice systems of the world. The
primary purpose of the CPJ is to maintain order and effect positive
change within the system.
|
|
17. Effectiveness
|
Effective to the extent that it is affordable, available and
objective in its evaluation of itself. With its lack of affordability
and unavailability to the average person due to the exhorbitant expense
of counsel and the complicated nature of its rules of procedure, it is
quickly becoming ineffective, dysfunctional and obsolete to the public
at large.
|
Always affordable, available and effective, provided the Plaintiff is
working with credible Media organizations who strive to bring out the
truth (some margin of human error accepted). It is truly the consuming
fire that burns away the stubble of political lies, corruption and
deception and brings about decisions based upon truth and justice, as
such can be found.
|
|
18. Conclusion
|
If conducted under the checks and balances of the WWWCPJ, the
traditional government systems can be improved and made more functional
for "We the People".
|
If conducted under the highest ethical standards the WWCPJ will
balance our traditional system of justice to keep it fair and just.
|
