Trial procedures or general court rules for interaction between all
members and participants of the Court during an active case are as
follows:
The Media Judge / Referee
..... FOX, SKY... Media Referee ... BBC, CNN .....
When a case is approved for the Case Docket, three Media sources are
offered by the Plaintiff to qualify as the collective Judge / Referee
panel. This panel of Judges then oversees the case very much like the
operation of the United States Supreme Court. Of course, these media
sources must first accept the challenge, and their choice is highly
dependent on the quality and relevance of the case being presented and
evaluated by their news staff. Through the process of the initial
cases, the Court will establish a relationship with the Media based upon
credible cases that will help in this prequalification process. With
the first cases, patience is requested from the Plaintiffs and
Defendants to establish a network of regular participants.
In the Court of Public Justice, as in the traditional courtroom, the
panel of Judges will govern the process of questioning the witnesses and
the presentation and submission of evidence to qualify all as relevant
to the case before the information is released to the Jury. Once the
information presented into evidence is pre-qualified, then the evidence
is reported publicly to the jurors through the daily news release of
each Referee / Media source. The Court will supplement this process
each week with a news letter to all registered jurors with a polling
request for a verdict update which will also be reported to the news
desk of the panel of Judges and displayed in the subsequent weekly Court
newsletter. This process will continue until a final verdict is
concluded through the natural process of public opinion.
Plaintiff and Defendant:
The Plaintiff and Defendant in each case are expected to cooperate
with the news and evidence gathering process within the basic rules
of respect and dignity. Cooperating with any and all media
investigators is a part of this process and anyone who refuses to
cooperate must accept the responsibility of the weekly verdicts of the
Jury and the Referee's news reports based upon the information
provided. It is also preferred that the Plaintiff and Defendant
cooperate with each other from the beginning of the case to resolve the
conflict within the complaint to the best interests of themselves and
the public at large. As this process is designed to keep the
governmental system and services relevant to the people, a special
emphasis is placed upon the Plaintiff and Defendant to keep this in mind
at all times during the process of finding a common solution.
The Witnesses:
By definition, a witness is in the Court of Public Justice is defined
as anyone who presents evidence, either verbal, written or of relevance
of any kind in the case. As mentioned in the Juror Qualification
section, if you are a witness you cannot be involved in the Jury and
visa versa. With cases involving government corruption or highly
controversial issues that could be embarrassing or potentially
dangerous, witnesses may prefer to provide their evidence anonymously to
the media through a Court investigator which can provide some
insulation under the law for news reporters protected sources.
Traditionally this has been somewhat effective but not always absolute.
Witnesses may come forward at any time during the court process and may
be called upon by the panel of Referees, Plaintiff, Defendant, media
investigator / reporter or any combination of these case participants.
The Media Investigators:
In the tradition of media investigation, the first rule of evidence
is all is fair game. Unlike the traditional court room, there is no
limit to getting at the truth, subject of course to the basic human
rules of ethics and respect for the individual. When it comes to
privacy, the gloves are off when human rights are being violated and
laws are being broken. It is up to the panel of Referees and their
respective investigators to maintain order and be fair and equal in
their treatment of all participants. The purpose of the media
investigator is to bring out the truth and nothing but the truth that is
relevant to the case at hand and provide credible news reports to the
jurors to affect a just result.
The Jury, We the People:
As a member of the jury on a case filed with the World Wide Web Court
of Public Justice, you have become a privileged member of the Human
Family / Media partnership. For the first time in history this
formalized system of conscience to the traditional political systems of
the world has an organized voice that can and will affect the way our
governments represent the Human Family's best interests. The trial
procedures for the jury are quite simple. Read and study the case
filing and be attentive to all evidence and information presented
through the Court site, the news media and other resources provided, and
offer your objective opinion by faithfully voting once a week until the
final verdict is determined and/or the case in concluded.
Please continue by clicking on the following link: